Evaluation of these patients includes looking at the texture of their skin, to see if there are stretch marks, noting significant underlying damage to the skin’s ability to tighten . In addition, it’s important to look at the shape of the breast, the areolar size, the asymmetry of the breasts, and the age of the patient.
1 Implants
2 Breast aging
3 Surgeon
4 Anaethetist
5 Price variation
Read more

Cohesive Silicone Gel Implants have been approved for breast augmentation in
Australia and Canada .

Cohesive gel implants have a strong and durable silicone shell that is composed of several layers – to prevent the “gel bleed” that can occur with standard implants.

Additionally, the filler gel has a thick, jelly like consistency. If the shell were to rupture, the silicone would not spill out; in other words, the gel would retain its shape and integrity.

These breast implants also have a shape “memory,” meaning that they return to their original form, which lessens the chance that the shell will fold or ripple.

Furthermore, cohesive silicone gel implants are reportedly soft and natural feeling. They are best suited for women who want naturally shaped and proportionately sized breast augmentation.

One disadvantage of cohesive silicone gel implants is that the incision must be slightly larger for insertion. The insertion is usually performed through an incision under the breast or around the areola.

The experience of the Peter L Dixon clinic confirms excellent reliability and are achieving excellence in results that are not obtained with older style implants. Compared to saline implants the feel is softer and more like breast tissue.

Cohesive gel have a low incidence of capsular contraction and are suitable to be inserted in front of the muscle. Thus achieving in suitable patients the very best results.

For information on the moden approach to implant surgery register at our report center